The impact of passive alveolar molding vs. nasoalveolar molding on cleft width and other parameters of maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip palate.

OBJECTIVE: Passive alveolar molding (PAM) and nasoalveolar molding (NAM) are established presurgical infant orthodontic (PSIO) therapies for cleft lip palate (CLP) patients. PAM guides maxillary growth with a modified Hotz appliance, while NAM also uses extraoral taping and includes nasal stents. The effects of these techniques on alveolar arch growth have rarely been compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared 3D-scanned maxillary models obtained before and after PSIO from infants with unilateral, non-syndromic CLP treated with PAM (n = 16) versus NAM (n = 13). Nine anatomical points were set digitally by four raters and transversal/sagittal distances and rotations of the maxilla were measured. RESULTS: Both appliances reduced the anterior cleft, but NAM percentage wise more. NAM decreased the anterior and medial transversal width compared to PAM, which led to no change. With both appliances, the posterior width increased. The alveolar arch length of the great and small segments and the sagittal length of the maxilla increased with PAM but only partially with NAM. However, NAM induced a significant greater medial rotation of the larger and smaller segment compared to PAM with respect to the lateral angle. CONCLUSIONS: NAM and PAM presented some significant differences regarding maxillary growth. While NAM reduced the anterior cleft and effectively rotated the segments medially, PAM allowed more transversal and sagittal growth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study should be taken into consideration when to decide whether to use PAM or NAM, since they show a different outcome within the first few months. Further studies are necessary regarding long-term differences.

Orofacial clefts alter early life oral microbiome maturation towards higher levels of potentially pathogenic species: A prospective observational study.

Orofacial clefts (OFC) present different phenotypes with a postnatal challenge for oral microbiota development. In order to investigate the impact of OFC on oral microbiota, smear samples from 15 neonates with OFC and 17 neonates without OFC were collected from two oral niches (tongue, cheek) at two time points, i.e. after birth (T0: Ø3d OFC group; Ø2d control group) and 4-5 weeks later (T1: Ø32d OFC group; Ø31d control group). Subsequently, the samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. We detected a significant increase of alpha diversity and anaerobic and Gram-negative species from T0 to T1 in both groups. Further, we found that at T1 OFC neonates presented a significantly lower alpha diversity (lowest values for high cleft severity) and significantly higher levels of Enterobacteriaceae (Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia-Shigella, Klebsiella), Enterococcus, Bifidobacterium, Corynebacterium, Lactocaseibacillus, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter and Lawsonella compared to controls. Notably, neonates with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP/BCLP) presented similarities in beta diversity and a mixture with skin microbiota. However, significant differences were seen in neonates with cleft palate only compared to UCLP/BCLP with higher levels of anaerobic species. Our findings revealed an influence of OFC as well as cleft phenotype and severity on postnatal oral microbiota maturation.

Orofacial clefts lead to increased pro-inflammatory cytokine levels on neonatal oral mucosa.

Orofacial clefts (OFC) are frequent congenital malformations characterized by insufficient separation of oral and nasal cavities and require presurgical infant orthopedics and surgical interventions within the first year of life. Wound healing disorders and higher prevalence of gingivitis and plaque levels are well-known challenges in treatment of children with OFC. However, oral inflammatory mediators were not investigated after birth using non-invasive sampling methods so far. In order to investigate the impact of OFC on oral cytokine levels, we collected tongue smear samples from 15 neonates with OFC and 17 control neonates at two time points (T), T0 at first consultation after birth, and T1, 4 to 5 weeks later. The samples were analyzed using multiplex immunoassay. Overall, we found significantly increased cytokine levels (TNF, IL-1ß/-2/-6/-8/-10) in tongue smear samples from neonates with OFC compared to controls, especially at T0. The increase was even more pronounced in neonates with a higher cleft severity. Further, we detected a significant positive correlation between cleft severity score and distinct pro-inflammatory mediators (GM-CSF, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8) at T0. Further, we found that breast-milk (bottle) feeding was associated with lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6/-8) in neonates with OFC compared to formula-fed neonates. Our study demonstrated that neonates with OFC, especially with high cleft severity, are characterized by markedly increased inflammatory mediators in tongue smear samples within the first weeks of life potentially presenting a risk for oral inflammatory diseases. Therefore, an inflammatory monitoring of neonates with (severe) OFC and the encouragement of mother to breast-milk (bottle) feed might be advisable after birth and/or prior to cleft surgery.